New Relic vs Bugsnag

A side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and use cases to help you choose the right tool.

New Relic and Bugsnag are often evaluated together by teams building out their reliability stack. New Relic (observability platform for every engineer, founded 2008) is typically a fit for Developers, DevOps Teams, and SREs, while Bugsnag (error monitoring with stability scoring, built mainly around mobile and web apps, founded 2013) leans toward Mobile Engineers, Frontend Teams, and Release Managers. Both cover 8 of the same core capabilities, so the decision usually comes down to where they diverge.

New Relic

Observability platform for every engineer

Pricing: Usage-based limits: Free (500 checks/mo), Standard (10k checks), Pro (1M checks)

Founded: 2008

Best for: Developers, DevOps Teams, SREs

Visit New Relic

Bugsnag

Error monitoring with stability scoring, built mainly around mobile and web apps

Pricing: Free tier (7,500 events/mo), Team from ~$22/mo

Founded: 2013

Best for: Mobile Engineers, Frontend Teams, Release Managers

Visit Bugsnag

Feature Comparison

FeatureNew RelicBugsnag
Synthetic Monitoring
Real User Monitoring
API & Browser Testing
Self-Healing Tests
AI-Powered
Uptime Monitoring
Alerting
Slack Integration
CI/CD Integration
Multi-Location Checks
SSL Monitoring
Status Page
Open Source
On-Premise / Self-Host
Free Tier
API Access
Dashboards
Incident Management

Only in New Relic

  • Synthetic Monitoring
  • API & Browser Testing
  • Uptime Monitoring
  • Multi-Location Checks
  • SSL Monitoring
  • Incident Management

Only in Bugsnag

  • On-Premise / Self-Host

New Relic

Pros

  • + Generous free tier (100GB/month)
  • + Unified full-stack observability
  • + Strong synthetic monitoring capabilities
  • + Usage-based pricing is more predictable

Cons

  • UI can feel complex and overwhelming
  • No self-healing test automation
  • Costs spike with high data volume
  • Alert fatigue issues reported by users

Bugsnag

Pros

  • + Stability scores give you something concrete to target per release
  • + Mobile SDK coverage is good on iOS, Android, and React Native
  • + Error inbox is searchable and carries device + breadcrumb context
  • + Free tier covers 7,500 events a month

Cons

  • Pricing climbs fast once you blow past the free event quota
  • No synthetic or uptime monitoring
  • UI looks tired next to newer competitors
  • Performance monitoring is thinner than Sentry's

New Relic vs Bugsnag: Our Verdict

On capability breadth, New Relic pulls ahead here: it uniquely offers Synthetic Monitoring, API & Browser Testing, Uptime Monitoring, and Multi-Location Checks, among others. Choose New Relic if those matter to your workflow; Bugsnag (Free tier (7,500 events/mo), Team from ~$22/mo) remains a solid option if On-Premise / Self-Host is what you need.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main difference between New Relic and Bugsnag?

New Relic is observability platform for every engineer, while Bugsnag is error monitoring with stability scoring, built mainly around mobile and web apps. New Relic adds Synthetic Monitoring, API & Browser Testing, and Uptime Monitoring on top of the shared feature set. Bugsnag brings On-Premise / Self-Host that New Relic does not.

How do New Relic and Bugsnag compare on pricing?

New Relic pricing: Usage-based limits: Free (500 checks/mo), Standard (10k checks), Pro (1M checks). Bugsnag pricing: Free tier (7,500 events/mo), Team from ~$22/mo. Evaluate against your check volume and team size; entry pricing rarely reflects total cost at scale.

Which is better for Developers?

New Relic is designed with Developers, DevOps Teams, and SREs in mind, whereas Bugsnag targets Mobile Engineers, Frontend Teams, and Release Managers. If your team matches the former profile, New Relic is usually the closer fit.

Can ObserveOne replace New Relic and Bugsnag?

No. It does a different job. Error trackers tell you an exception fired. They can't see the failures that never throw: a checkout that silently breaks, an expired SSL certificate, a page that returns 200 and renders blank. ObserveOne monitors those user-facing journeys in production; teams run it alongside an error tracker, not instead of one.

What ObserveOne adds next to New Relic and Bugsnag

Error trackers tell you an exception fired. They can't see the failures that never throw: a checkout that silently breaks, an expired SSL certificate, a page that returns 200 and renders blank. ObserveOne monitors those user-facing journeys in production; teams run it alongside an error tracker, not instead of one. The free tier covers enough to try it on one critical journey.

Related Comparisons

Alternatives to each tool

Each tool has its own alternatives page too, not just this matchup.

Features Both Tools Share

Real User MonitoringAI-PoweredAlertingSlack IntegrationCI/CD IntegrationFree TierAPI AccessDashboards

How we compare

  • Feature flags and pricing come from each vendor's public docs and pricing pages, last reviewed June 2026. Spot an error? Tell us and we'll fix the data.
  • ObserveOne is our product. The data is collected the same way for every tool; the recommendations are ours.