New Relic vs PagerDuty

A side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and use cases to help you choose the right tool.

New Relic and PagerDuty are often evaluated together by teams building out their reliability stack. New Relic (observability platform for every engineer, founded 2008) is typically a fit for Developers, DevOps Teams, and SREs, while PagerDuty (digital operations management and incident response, founded 2009) leans toward DevOps Teams, SREs, and On-call Engineers. Both cover 8 of the same core capabilities, so the decision usually comes down to where they diverge.

New Relic

Observability platform for every engineer

Pricing: Usage-based limits: Free (500 checks/mo), Standard (10k checks), Pro (1M checks)

Founded: 2008

Best for: Developers, DevOps Teams, SREs

Visit New Relic

PagerDuty

Digital operations management and incident response

Pricing: Free (5 users), Pro $21/user/mo, Business $41/user/mo (+ Add-ons)

Founded: 2009

Best for: DevOps Teams, SREs, On-call Engineers

Visit PagerDuty

Feature Comparison

FeatureNew RelicPagerDuty
Synthetic Monitoring
Real User Monitoring
API & Browser Testing
Self-Healing Tests
AI-Powered
Uptime Monitoring
Alerting
Slack Integration
CI/CD Integration
Multi-Location Checks
SSL Monitoring
Status Page
Open Source
On-Premise / Self-Host
Free Tier
API Access
Dashboards
Incident Management

Only in New Relic

  • Synthetic Monitoring
  • Real User Monitoring
  • API & Browser Testing
  • Uptime Monitoring
  • Multi-Location Checks
  • SSL Monitoring

Only in PagerDuty

  • Status Page

New Relic

Pros

  • + Generous free tier (100GB/month)
  • + Unified full-stack observability
  • + Strong synthetic monitoring capabilities
  • + Usage-based pricing is more predictable

Cons

  • UI can feel complex and overwhelming
  • No self-healing test automation
  • Costs spike with high data volume
  • Alert fatigue issues reported by users

PagerDuty

Pros

  • + Industry-leading incident response workflows
  • + Reliable on-call scheduling and escalation
  • + Wide integration ecosystem
  • + Strong automation with runbooks

Cons

  • Expensive for small teams
  • Complex to configure initially
  • No monitoring, needs to pair with a tool like Datadog
  • Alert fatigue without tuning

New Relic vs PagerDuty: Our Verdict

On capability breadth, New Relic pulls ahead here: it uniquely offers Synthetic Monitoring, Real User Monitoring, API & Browser Testing, and Uptime Monitoring, among others. Choose New Relic if those matter to your workflow; PagerDuty (Free (5 users), Pro $21/user/mo, Business $41/user/mo (+ Add-ons)) remains a solid option if Status Page is what you need.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main difference between New Relic and PagerDuty?

New Relic is observability platform for every engineer, while PagerDuty is digital operations management and incident response. New Relic adds Synthetic Monitoring, Real User Monitoring, and API & Browser Testing on top of the shared feature set. PagerDuty brings Status Page that New Relic does not.

How do New Relic and PagerDuty compare on pricing?

New Relic pricing: Usage-based limits: Free (500 checks/mo), Standard (10k checks), Pro (1M checks). PagerDuty pricing: Free (5 users), Pro $21/user/mo, Business $41/user/mo (+ Add-ons). Evaluate against your check volume and team size; entry pricing rarely reflects total cost at scale.

Which is better for Developers?

New Relic is designed with Developers, DevOps Teams, and SREs in mind, whereas PagerDuty targets DevOps Teams, SREs, and On-call Engineers. If your team matches the former profile, New Relic is usually the closer fit.

Can ObserveOne replace New Relic and PagerDuty?

No. It does a different job. On-call and status tools decide who gets paged and what customers see, but they need a detection layer feeding them. ObserveOne is that layer: scheduled synthetic checks on your critical journeys that catch the outage and hand it to your incident process.

What ObserveOne adds next to New Relic and PagerDuty

On-call and status tools decide who gets paged and what customers see, but they need a detection layer feeding them. ObserveOne is that layer: scheduled synthetic checks on your critical journeys that catch the outage and hand it to your incident process. The free tier covers enough to try it on one critical journey.

Related Comparisons

Alternatives to each tool

Each tool has its own alternatives page too, not just this matchup.

Features Both Tools Share

AI-PoweredAlertingSlack IntegrationCI/CD IntegrationFree TierAPI AccessDashboardsIncident Management

How we compare

  • Feature flags and pricing come from each vendor's public docs and pricing pages, last reviewed June 2026. Spot an error? Tell us and we'll fix the data.
  • ObserveOne is our product. The data is collected the same way for every tool; the recommendations are ours.